This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
"BREAKING: The $100 Billion Question - Can Biosimilars Disrupt the Status Quo in Biologic Drug Reimbursement Models? As the biologic market continues to grow, the impact of biosimilars on reimbursement models is becoming increasingly clear.
In areas like biologics, biosimilars, and interchangeable biosimilars, where emerging technologies meet regulatory complexities, this is perhaps a wise strategy. But in the biologics and biosimilar industries, maintaining quality can be a very nuanced—if not difficult—process.
IPRs have become an important tool used by generic drug and biosimilar manufacturers to try and clear patent thickets covering brand-name products prior to or during the pendency of an ANDA or aBLA submission. Eliminating invalid patents under § 101 enables generic and biosimilar companies to streamline pharmaceutical litigation.
To learn more about the global generic drug market, including its trends, opportunities, and challenges, check out our latest blog post: [link] What do you think is the most significant challenge facing the global generic drug market? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Farquhar This is the first in a series of blog posts on tips for successfully handling an FDA inspection. Much of the debate on this issue centers on whether FDA can take photographs during an inspection (see our previous blog post ). Walsh & Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. & & Douglas B.
Curl up with your favorite pumpkin-spiced blog and savor these stories harvested from the Drug Channels patch: Fresh insights about hospitals’ specialty drug profits SSR Update: Drug prices keep dropping My $0.02 Autumn is here! You can also find me on LinkedIn , where I have more than 20,000 followers.
Finally, FDA asks Congress to amend to FDCA § 505(j) to address the submission and review of drug-device combination product ANDAs, as well as drug products submitted in an ANDA that are used with devices.
Expect another blog from us in the coming days that will provide a more detailed discussion of what this decision means for healthcare practitioners, the laboratory industry, and the public. Laposata were represented by a team at Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.,
This Revised Draft Guidance provides considerations for manufacturers, packers or distributors (dubbed “firms”) of prescription biological reference products, biosimilar products, and interchangeable biosimilar products presenting data and information about such products in promotional materials in a truthful and non-misleading way.
The FIE determination released in fall 2023 involves the Reference Product AbbVie’s Humira (adalimumab) and two interchangeable biosimilars—first approved is Cyltezo (adalimumab-adbm), filed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, which was followed by Abrilada (adalimumab-afzb), filed by Pfizer.
Koblitz — In a short but sweet Guidance issued last week, FDA proposed a dramatic change to the way it evaluates interchangeable biosimilars. But, as time has marched on and FDA’s experience with interchangeable biosimilars grown, the Agency’s “experience has shown that.
FDA Law Blog is a conference media partner. As such, we can offer our readers a special 10% discount. The discount code is: D10-999-FDA25. You can access the conference brochure and sign up for the event here.
Specifically, Boehringer asked FDA to interpret “strength” for biosimilars to mean “total drug content” to the exclusion of “concentration.” mL), to be biosimilar to or interchangeable with High Concentration Humira (e.g., mL), to be biosimilar to or interchangeable with High Concentration Humira (e.g.,
At first, this option was only available for Type A meetings, Biosimilar Product Development (BPD) Type 1 sessions, and Type X meetings. In June 2023, the list expanded to include Type B End-of-Phase 2 meetings (which we blogged about here ). And there we stayed for 6 more months, until now.
As we outlined in a previous blog , by FDA’s own (artificially low) estimate, the agency anticipates in will receive, in a single year: 32,160 510(k) premarket notifications; 4,210 PMAs, PDPs, Panel-Track PMA Supplements; and 4,020 de novo This is 10 times the number of submissions the agency currently receives in a year across all device types.
The final guidance hasnt changed much from the draft guidance with respect to the type of modifications FDA considers applicable for a PCCP and the required components of a PCCP (see our prior blog post on the draft guidance here ).
As such, we can offer our readers a special 10% discount. The discount code is: D10-999-FDA25. You can access the conference brochure and sign up for the event here.
In particular, the article discusses FDA’s April 2023 draft guidance on pre-determined change control plans (which we previously blogged on here ) and whether such plans afford sufficient flexibility for AI/ML developers to innovate and improve products based on new data while also providing sufficient guardrails to ensure patient safety.
As to biosimilars, FDORA amends the statutory language regarding criteria for the demonstration of biosimilarity for a 351(k) biologic. For more on FDORA’s other provisions, see HPM’s complete summary here ). 42 U.S.C. § 262(k)(2)(A)(i)(I). FDORA § 3209(b).
As we previously blogged, under the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (FDARA), FDA committed to establish an ASCA Program using FDA-recognized consensus standards. The ASCA pilot program concluded in 2023 after seven (7) years based on data demonstrating the pilots objectives were met or surpassed.
FDA Law Blog readers receive a 10% discount (use FDA Law Blog promo code: D10-999-FDA25). This program lays the groundwork for understanding the patent life cycles of biopharmaceutical products and business development plans. To learn more about the program and to view the agenda, see here.
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert Last year, FDA issued a letter to the medical device industry warning medical device firms of concerns related to fraudulent and unreliable laboratory testing data in premarket submissions, which we blogged about here.
CDRH As of this blog post, CDRH has not made any official announcements regarding the resumption of in-person meetings. Advisory Committee Meetings As of this blog post, all Advisory Committee Meetings that FDA has announced will be conducted via an online platform.
FDA Law Blog readers are offered a discount of 10% off the registration price. The discount code is 25HYMAN10. You can access conference information and register for the event here.
See our prior blog post on the topic here. Since that time, FDA issued a draft guidance for predetermined change control plans (PCCPs) for Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) software functions.
The electronic Submission Template and Resource (eSTAR) program, which we blogged about here and here , also makes the highlight reel given its aim to improve consistency and efficiency in how 510(k)s are prepared. Over the years, we’ve blogged on similar initiatives related to the 510(k) pathway.
Godwin provided updated information on the presentation made the day before by another CDER official, Jennifer Maguire, the Director of the Office of Quality Surveillance within the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality at CDER, We summarized in a blog post yesterday her comments about facilities with FDA inspections that had been classified as Official (..)
to help identify and address efforts to block or delay generic drug and biosimilar competition,” but, given FDA’s ministerial role in administering the Orange Book and FDA’s insistence that it will not review patents before they’re listed, it is unclear what FDA role will play.
eSTAR Templates As we have previously explained in our blog post here , eSTAR is an interactive PDF form designed to assist users in creating “complete” submissions. A 513(g) Request for Information is a means of obtaining FDA’s views about the classification and regulatory requirements for a particular device.
Gibbs — Thank you to readers of this blog. By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Jeffrey N. We received incredible feedback on our August 19 post analyzing the number of decision summaries that have been posted for De Novos. We are happy to report that fifteen new decision summaries have been posted as of August 28.
FDA Law Blog readers can receive a 10% discount off the conference registration price. Please join Faraz in discussing the impact of the recent rules and proposed regulations on Medicaid, including CMS’s 2022 rule on multiple best prices. Also, please say hi in person or over the conference app!
Under the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (see our blog post here ), all final monographs (i.e., Livornese — FDA posted the last five “deemed final orders” under OTC monograph reform this week. All 33 of the final orders can now be found at OTCMONOGRAPHS@FDA. the regulations formerly found in 21 C.F.R.
Mr. Karst, a co-author of the FDA Law Blog, provides regulatory counsel to pharmaceutical manufacturers on Hatch-Waxman patent and exclusivity, drug development, pediatric testing, and orphan drugs. Karst was named by Who’s Who Legal: Life Sciences 2023 as one of only 14 “Global Elite Thought Leaders.”
FDA Law Blog readers receive a 10% discount off the tuition fee (promo code D10-999-FDA25 ). Claud will be speaking at the conference in a session titled “Crafting Your Safety Blueprint for Adverse Events and Recalls under MoCRA.” You can register for the conference here.
Save 10% with the FDA Law Blog promo code: D10-999-FDA24. This program will also lay the necessary foundation to understand the dynamics of the applicable patent life cycles for biopharmaceutical products and business development plans. To learn more visit here , or email at customerservice@americanconference.com.
For the 40th anniversary of the Orange Book (and the quasi-35th anniversary of Hatch-Waxman), we put together a public Orange Book Archive (and it has become one of the more popular stops on the FDA Law Blog). So what should we do here on the FDA Law Blog to celebrate the 40th anniversary of Hatch-Waxman? Waxman (sadly, Sen.
As we have blogged about extensively over the years, FDA has initiated, but not completed, many efforts through different means to create a regulatory framework for LDTs. This proposed rule is a long-time coming.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 15,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content